![]() |
|
Tuberculosis 2007 687 pages Download PDF, 8.3 MB Home Preface 1. History 2. Molecular Evolution 3. Clinical Bacteriology 4. Genomics and Proteomics 5. Immunology/Pathogenesis 6. Host genetics 7. Epidemiology 8. Other M. tuberculosis 9. Molecular Epidemiology 10. New Vaccines 11. Biosafety/Hospital Control 12. Diagnostic Methods 13. Immunological Diagnosis 14. New Diagnostic Methods 15. Tuberculosis in Adults 16. Tuberculosis in Children 17. Tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS 18. Treatment and Drugs 19. Drug Resistance 20. New Perspectives Comments and Suggestions Copyright Removal Disclaimer About Editors Juan Carlos Palomino Sylvia Cardoso Leão Viviana Ritacco Contributing Authors
|
Chapter 12: Conventional Diagnostic Methods by Jacobus H. de Waard and Jaime Robledo
12.1. Introduction Active tuberculosis (TB) is diagnosed by detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex bacilli in specimens from the respiratory tract (pulmonary TB) or in specimens from other bodily sites (extrapulmonary TB). Although many new (molecular) diagnostic methods have been developed, acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and culture on Löwenstein-Jensen medium are still the "gold standards" for the diagnosis of active TB and, especially in low-resource countries, the only methods available for confirming TB in patients with a clinical presumption of active disease. AFB smear microscopy is rapid and inexpensive and thus is a very useful method to identify highly contagious patients. Culture is used to detect cases with low mycobacterial loads and is also requested in cases at risk of drug-resistant TB for drug susceptibility testing, or in cases where disease due to another member of the Mycobacterium genus is suspected. AFB smear microscopy and culture can also be used to monitor the effectiveness of treatment and can help to determine when a patient is less likely to be infectious. Two manuals are recommended for the laboratory diagnosis of TB (Kent 1985, Master 1992). Good reviews on this issue are also available on the internet at http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/dls/ila/TB_Toolbox.aspx. The authors of this chapter wish to emphasize that accurate case detection is the rate-limiting step in TB control (Perkins 2002). While as many as two thirds of sputum smear-positive cases probably remain undetected worldwide, the efforts to control the disease have focused more on curing TB cases than on detecting them. (Gupta 2004, Dye 2003). Even though the laboratory is essential for the diagnosis and control of TB, it does not receive enough attention in developing countries, where AFB sputum microscopy is often the only available method to diagnose TB. Sputum microscopy lacks sensitivity, especially in children and in people living with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS). Its usefulness depends largely on the quality of the sputum specimen and the performance quality of the laboratory. Considerable efforts have been made to improve the sensitivity of sputum smear microscopy (Steingart 2006) and special emphasis will be given in this chapter to these efforts. Culturing of M. tuberculosis has become increasingly important in the last decades, in particular because of the need for drug resistance testing. As most laboratories in low-resource countries have no access to culturing mycobacteria, alternative simple culturing methods will be discussed, as well as the value of alternative culture media such as blood agar, which is more readily available in most laboratory settings than the traditional egg-based media used for mycobacterial isolation. Although no multicenter studies have been published to show their efficiency for cultivating mycobacteria, we think that these alternatives should be presented in this chapter, because they may be particularly useful in settings where standard procedures simply cannot be performed due to the absence of laboratory equipment or reagents. In addition, we will discuss the utility of adenosine deaminase activity for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB: tuberculous meningitis, tuberculous pleural effusions, and tuberculous peritonitis. These presentations of TB are difficult to diagnose by smear staining and culture, and for this reason, they probably remain underdiagnosed in resource-poor countries. more... (PDF) or
Download of the entire textbook
12.2. Specimen handling
12.2.1. Specimens
The successful isolation of the pathogen requires that the best specimen be properly collected,
promptly transported and carefully processed. Many different types of clinical specimens may be
obtained for the microbiological diagnosis. If pulmonary TB is suspected, specimens originating from
the respiratory tract should be collected, i.e. sputum, induced sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage or a
lung biopsy. For the diagnosis of pulmonary TB, three first-morning sputum specimens (not saliva)
obtained after a deep, productive cough on non-consecutive days are usually recommended. Several
studies have shown, however, that the value of the third sputum is negligible for the diagnosis of
TB, as virtually all cases are identified from the first and/or the second specimen (Yassin 2003,
Nelson 1998, Dorronsoro 2000, Finch 1997). Before processing, sputum specimens must be classified at
the laboratory with regard to their quality, i.e. bloody, purulent, mucopurulent, saliva (see also
section 12.2.2).
In patients who cannot produce it spontaneously, the sputum can be induced by inhalation of
hypertonic saline solution. Otherwise, the specimen can be collected from bronchoscopy. This
intervention usually provokes cough and post-bronchoscopy expectorated sputum specimens should be
collected because they often provide satisfactory microorganism yields (Sarkar 1980, de Gracia
1988). Some studies suggest that a single induced sputum specimen is equally effective as
bronchoscopy for diagnosing pulmonary TB (Anderson 1995, Conde 2000). A recent study demonstrated
that the most cost-effective strategy is to perform three induced sputum tests without bronchoscopy
(MacWilliams 2002). On the contrary, transbronchial biopsy specimens contribute little to the
bacteriological diagnosis of TB (Stenson 1983, Chan 1992). "Fasting" gastric aspirates is the
specimen of choice in the case of young children who cannot cough up phlegm. Gastric lavage fluid
must be neutralized with sodium carbonate immediately after collection (100 mg per 5-10 mL
specimen).
Specimens to be collected for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary disease depend on the site of the
disease. The most common specimens received in the laboratory are biopsies, aspirates, pus, urine,
and normally sterile body fluids, including cerebrospinal fluid, synovial, pleural, pericardial, and
peritoneal liquid. Stool can be collected when intestinal TB is suspected and also in the case of
suspected Mycobacterium avium infection in AIDS patients. Whole blood and/or bone marrow specimens
are collected only if disseminated TB is suspected, mainly in patients with an underlying severe
immunosuppressive condition such as AIDS. Bone biopsies are the specimen of choice when skeletal TB
is suspected. In general, AFB smear microscopy from body fluids is rarely positive and the whole
sediment from concentrated specimens should rather be cultured. In tuberculous pleural effusions,
the diagnostic value of the pleural biopsy is much higher than that of the fluid and, therefore, is
the specimen of choice for the diagnosis (Escudero 1990, Valdez 1998). The diagnosis of peritoneal
and pericardial TB is difficult and usually requires invasive procedures such as laparoscopy and
biopsy.
Specimens should be collected in sterile, leak-proof containers and labeled with the patient's name
and/or identification number before anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy is started. Induced sputum
specimens should be labeled as such because they resemble saliva and may be disregarded at the
laboratory. Specimens must be collected aseptically in order to minimize contamination with other
bacteria.
Blood and other specimens prone to coagulate, including bone marrow, synovial, pleural, pericardial
and peritoneal fluids, should be collected in tubes containing sulfated polysaccharides or heparin.
Sulfated polysaccharides are the preferred anticoagulants as they enhance the growth of
mycobacteria. Heparinized specimens are also satisfactory, but specimens collected in
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) are unacceptable as even trace amounts of this substance
inhibit mycobacterial growth. Lymph nodes, skin lesion material, and tissue biopsy specimens should
come without preservatives or fixatives and should not be immersed in saline or any fluid. Once in
the laboratory, tissue specimens are homogenized in a sterile tissue grinder with a small amount of
sterile saline solution before AFB smear staining or culture. Abscess contents or aspirated fluids
can be collected in a syringe. If renal TB is suspected, the specimen of choice is the first-morning
urine, at least 50 mL, obtained by catheterization or from the midstream clean catch on three
consecutive days. Urine specimens should be submitted to a decontamination step for mycobacteria
prior to cultivation.
12.2.2. Specimen transport
Diagnostic specimens (sputum, blood, tissue) and mycobacterial cultures can be mailed, but
transportation of dangerous or infectious goods is regulated by law in many countries. Specific
shipping instructions can be found in the guide by Kent (Kent 1985). Shipments by private couriers
are regulated by the International Air Transportation Association (IATA), and its shipping
guidelines for infectious substances can be found on the internet at
http://www.iata.org/training/courses/tcgp22.htm. The guidelines released by the WHO in 2007 are
available at
http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/biosafety/WHO_CDS_EPR_2007_2/en/index.html. Mailing
instructions for specimens and cultures are also available at the National Jewish Hospital site:
http://www.njc.org/pdf/2005 shipping instructions.doc.
Specimens should be transported rapidly to the laboratory to avoid overgrowth by other
microorganisms. This is particularly true for specimens from non-sterile sites, such as sputum. When
the transport or the processing is delayed, specimens should be stored for not more than five days
at 4°C until transported or presented for bacteriological processing. The cetylpyridinium chloride
(CPC) method is widely used for the transport of sputum specimens (Smithwick 1975). CPC eliminates
the associated flora in sputum specimens and treated specimens should not be submitted to further
decontamination prior to cultivation. The detection of AFB with Ziehl-Neelsen staining can be
significantly reduced in specimens preserved by this method (Selvakumar 2004, Selvakumar 2006).
Re-staining seems to increase the detection in sputum specimens transported in CPC solution
(Selvakumar 2005). In addition, CPC inhibits mycobacterial growth, especially when inoculated in
culture media including Middlebrook 7H9 and 7H10, which have an insufficient neutralizing activity
for this quaternary ammonium compound. Therefore, specimens treated with CPC should be
preferentially inoculated in egg-based media (Smithwick 1975). In a comparative study, sodium
carbonate was found to be a better preservative of sputum specimens for AFB smear microscopy as well
as culture (Bobadilla 2003). However, no comparative study has been undertaken to confirm this
observation.
Figure 12-1: Example of packaging of infectious specimens.
12.2.3. Biosafety
This subject is thoroughly discussed in Chapter 11. Thus, in this chapter, laboratory safety will
only be briefly addressed. Laboratory diagnosis of TB involves a risk of infection for laboratory
personnel. Specimens with high mycobacterial loads, such as sputum or cultures, are often
manipulated with limited biosafety measures, especially in low-resource countries. Although only
limited information can be found in the literature on the risk of developing TB in laboratory
personnel (Reid 1957, Kim 2007), studies in healthcare workers in contact with TB patients clearly
show that TB can be considered as an occupational disease (Joshi 2006, Seidler 2005, Kilinc 2002).
Biosafety cabinets are seldom available in developing countries, and safety facilities for working
with infectious specimens are limited. The only measure often taught to give any protection against
infection with M. tuberculosis is processing infectious specimens behind the flame of a Bunsen
burner, that is, the specimens are handled and the smear is prepared with the flame of the Bunsen
burner interposed between the operator and the specimen. As far as we know, however, this measure
has never been evaluated. Good laboratory practice is required for the protection of laboratory
staff from infectious airborne bacilli, i.e. good ventilation, use of laboratory coats, surgical
gloves and face masks, hand washing and regular disinfection of the laboratory floor and surfaces,
especially benches, with a disinfectant that is active against mycobacteria. This disinfectant may
be 70 % ethanol or sodium hypochlorite (house bleach) at a concentration of 0.2-0.5 % (see Chapter
11). Ultraviolet light, emitting rays of wavelength 254 nm, is very effective in killing the
tubercle bacillus and other mycobacteria; it is also an additional measure for decontaminating work
surfaces and killing airborne microorganisms (David 1973, Riley 1989). Good laboratory practice for
handling TB specimens can be found in the guidelines by Kent (Kent 1985) and on the web page of the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention http://www.cdc.gov/od/ohs/tb/tbdoc2.htm; this web page
also offers an inquiry for assessing safety in your laboratory at
http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/mpep/pdf/mtb/tb-ayl.pdf.
12.3. Smear staining
12.3.1. AFB smear staining
AFB smear microscopy plays an important role in the early diagnosis of mycobacterial infections
because most mycobacteria grow slowly and culture results become available only after weeks of
incubation. In addition, AFB smear microscopy is often the only available diagnostic method in
developing countries. Smear staining is based on the high lipid content of the cell wall of
mycobacteria which makes them resistant to decolorization by acid-alcohol after the primary staining
(see Chapter 3). To determine that a clinical specimen contains AFB, the specimen is spread onto a
microscope slide, heat-fixed, stained with a primary staining, decolorized with acid-alcohol
solution and counterstained with a contrasting dye in order to obtain better differentiation between
the microorganism and the background. The slide is observed under the microscope for the detection
of AFB. Several methods can be used for determining the acid-fast nature of an organism.
Two methods, Ziehl-Neelsen and Kinyoun, utilize basic fuchsin in ethanol for primary staining. In
both cases, AFB appear red after decolorization with acid-alcohol. Ziehl-Neelsen is a hot acid-fast
stain because the slide has to be heated during incubation with fuchsin. In contrast, Kinyoun
staining is a cold acid-fast staining procedure and therefore does not require heating. Kinyoun's
cold carbol fuchsin method is inferior to the Ziehl-Neelsen staining (Somoskovi 2001, Van Deun
2005). Details for the preparation of smear staining with the Ziehl-Neelsen method can be found in
the following guidelines available on the internet: The WHO Laboratory Services in TB Control Part
II Microscopy http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/dls/ila/documents/lstc2.pdf), the CDC Acid-Fast Direct Smear
Microscopy Participant Manual (http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/dls/ila/acidfasttraining/participants.aspx),
and the IUATLD technical guide
(http://www.iuatld.org/pdf/en/guides_publications/microscopy_guide.pdf).
In the fluorochrome procedure, primary staining is done with auramine O. The AFB fluoresce yellow
against a counterstain of potassium permanganate when observed with a fluorescence microscope. While
the reading of fuchsin-stained smears requires 1000x magnification, fluorochrome-stained smears are
examined at 250x or 450x. The lower magnification used in this staining method allows the
microscopist to observe a much larger area of the smear during the same period of time and thus,
fewer fields must be read. This makes the method faster and reduces laboratorist fatigue. Allegedly,
fluorescent staining is more sensitive than Ziehl-Neelsen staining (Steingart 2006). However, it has
been claimed that both methods have comparable sensitivity, provided procedural standards are
followed, and a minimum of 300 fields are read with the Ziehl-Neelsen staining (Somoskovi 2001).
Because of the rapidity of the fluorochrome method, laboratories processing large numbers of
specimens should adopt this technique. A real disadvantage of the fluorochrome method is that
fluorescence fades with time. For this reason, the slides must be read within 24 hours. This
staining method is not often available in developing countries due to the high cost of the
fluorescence microscope and, especially, that of its maintenance.
The results of the smear microscopy should be reported according to an internationally agreed
quantitation scale.
Table 12-1: Quantitation scale recommended by the World Health Organization and the International
Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
Count on Ziehl-Neelsen /Kinyoun stain (1000x) Count on Auramine/rhodamine (450x) Report
0 0 Non AFB observed
1-9/100 fields
Observed count divided by 4 Exact count
10-99/100 fields 1+
1-10/field 2+
> 10/field 3+
12.3.2. Quality control of AFB smear microscopy
Patients with infectious TB may remain undetected due to unreliable laboratory diagnosis. In
addition, errors in AFB smear microscopy reading can result in patients being put on treatment
without having the disease. Therefore, quality assurance of AFB sputum smear microscopy is
essential, and the quality of laboratory services should be considered a high priority of the
National TB Control Programmes.
More details for quality assessment for AFB smear microscopy can be fond in the following guidelines
available on the internet: Quality Assurance of Sputum Microscopy
(http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/dls/ila/acidfasttraining/participants/pdf/ParticipantModule10.pdf) and
Quality Assurance of Sputum Microscopy in the DOTS Programmes
(http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/769B76D6-270F-4438-A4BE-D6B9FAC3902E/0/Quality_assurance_for_s
putum_WP.pdf). These quality assurance programs are based on systematic monitoring of working
practices, technical procedures, equipment and materials, including quality of stains, site
evaluation of laboratory/quality improvement and also training, when needed.
An aspect usually overlooked in TB case finding and laboratory quality assessment is the quality of
the sputum specimen itself. When the patient is thoroughly instructed on sputum sampling, the
microscopic diagnosis of TB improves substantially (Alisjahbana 2005). Poor quality of the sputum
specimen often results in AFB smear microscopy negative results (Hirooka 2004). Registering the
quality of the sputum specimens received at the laboratory could help to improve sputum sampling.
Satisfactory quality implies the presence of mucoid or mucopurulent material and a volume of 3-5 ml,
although smaller volumes are acceptable if the consistency is adequate. If a relatively high
percentage of the specimens received are saliva, the laboratory should report this to the medical
staff, and instructions should be given to nurses and physicians on how to improve the quality of
sputum sampling.
12.3.3. Concentrated sputum smears
Sputum is the most common specimen received for TB diagnosis. The minimum number of bacilli needed
to detect their presence in stained smears has been estimated to be 5,000-10,000 per mL of sputum.
For diagnosis, the sensitivity of AFB smear staining relative to culture has been estimated to vary
from 50 % to over 80 %. Several studies have been published on improving smear microscopy
performance using methods that concentrate the bacilli present in the sputum specimen. The methods
consist of submitting the specimen to a liquefaction step prior to concentrating it by sedimentation
or centrifugation. The smears are then performed from the sediment and stained for microscopic
examination. The chemical method used for the liquefaction depends on the next step following
concentration; smear staining only or smear staining followed by culturing.
The best known concentration procedure is the 'bleach microscopy method', in which the sputum is
liquefied with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl or household bleach), and concentrated by centrifugation
before AFB staining. This technique is inexpensive and easy to perform. In addition, NaOCl is a
potent disinfectant that also kills mycobacteria, thus reducing the risk of laboratory-acquired
infection but, at the same time, rendering the method unsuitable for culturing. A significant
improvement in the proportion of positive AFB smear results has been reported, ranging from 7 % to
253 % (Angeby 2004).
Other concentration methods should be used if the specimen is to be cultured. The sediment of a
sputum specimen liquefied and decontaminated with sodium hydroxide-N-acetyl-L-cysteine method (see
decontamination procedures below) and concentrated by centrifugation can also be examined by AFB
smear staining. An advantage of this method is that the same sediment can be cultured, in contrast
to those liquefied with the NaOCl method described above. Other methods involving sputum
liquefaction with different substances, and concentration either by sedimentation or centrifugation,
have been proposed. The methods using dithiothreitol (Murray 2003), chitin (Farnia 2004) and
C(18)-carboxypropylbetaine (Scott 2002) have been evaluated favorably for the preparation of
concentrated smears. Sputum concentration methods were recently reviewed (Steingart 2006) and
compared with direct smears. The authors concluded that concentration by centrifugation and
sedimentation with any of several chemical methods (including bleach) is more sensitive than direct
AFB sputum smear examination.
12.4. Adenosine deaminase activity
Adenosine deaminase, also known as ADA, is an enzyme involved in the metabolism of purines. Its
presence is needed for the breakdown of adenosine from food and for the turnover of nucleic acids in
tissues. Many articles and reviews have reported the utility of ADA determination in body fluids
(spinal, pleural, ascitic, pericardial) for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (Kashyap 2006,
Lopez-Cortes 1995), tuberculous pleurisy (Banales 1991, Goto 2003, Perez-Rodriguez 2000), peritoneal
TB (Aston 1997, Gilroy 2006) and pericardial TB (Tuon 2006, Reuter 2006). AFB may be difficult to
isolate from these specimens because they are often diluted in large fluid volumes. Biopsy specimens
have a better yield, but biopsy is not always available in low-resource settings. ADA determination
is simple and cheap and also has a high positive predictive value, especially in high endemic
countries. The routine use of this method is justified in exudates of pleural, peritoneal and
pericardial fluids. The specificity is very high in fluids with a lymphocyte-to-neutrophil ratio
higher than 0.75 (Burgess 1996, Diacon 2003). The suggested laboratory cut-off of ADA activity is 40
U/L for pleural, peritoneal and pericardial fluids and 10 U/L for cerebrospinal fluid. However
different laboratories have established different cut-offs varying between 33 and 50 U/L.
As the description of the ADA assay is not readily available in the literature, it is detailed here.
ADA is determined colorimetrically (Giusti 1974). A 25 µL specimen is incubated for 60 min at 37°C
with 500 µL of 21 mM adenosine in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0. The reaction is interrupted by
incubation with 1.5 mL of phenol nitroprusside at 37°C for 30 min (106 mM phenol, 0.17 mM sodium
nitroprusside) in the presence of 1.5 mL of sodium hypochlorite (11 mM NaOCl plus 125 mM NaOH). The
amount of ammonium ion released by the ADA reaction is determined as absorbance (optical density,
OD) at 628 nm wavelength in a spectrophotometer (blue color). To control for the ammonium present in
the patient's specimen before addition of exogenous adenosine, specimens without substrate are run
in parallel (specimen blank). A standard (15 mM ammonium sulfate stock solution) and a reagent blank
(50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0) are also included in the assay. The activity in the patient's
specimen is calculated with the formula:
Activity in specimen = (OD specimen - OD specimen blank) / (OD standard - OD reagent blank) x 50
with the result expressed in Units/L.
12.5. Culture
12.5.1. Sterile or contaminated specimens
Acid-fast microscopy is easy and quick, but it does not confirm TB diagnosis because mycobacteria
other than M. tuberculosis are also AFB in the smear microscopic examination. In addition, a high
bacterial load is needed in the specimen to render an AFB microscopy result positive. Culture
techniques have been estimated to detect as many as 10-1,000 viable mycobacteria per mL of specimen.
Therefore, although most TB control programs do not support its widespread use due to enhanced
laboratory complexity, biohazard and cost, in our view, all specimens should be submitted to
culture, regardless of AFB smear microscopy results. A positive culture for M. tuberculosis confirms
the diagnosis of active disease.
For culturing of mycobacteria, two types of clinical specimens are considered: contaminated
specimens and specimens collected aseptically from normally sterile sites. Sterile specimens can be
inoculated directly onto the culture medium. Specimens from non-sterile bodily sites are considered
contaminated and therefore require processing before culturing in order to eliminate the associated
flora. If not properly eliminated, this flora will overgrow the culture medium long before
mycobacteria have the chance to develop visible colonies.
12.5.2 Decontamination procedures
Several methods have been used to minimize culture contamination when specimens from non-sterile
body sites are processed. Most of these methods include the digestion of mucus or organic debris and
treatment to eliminate micro-organisms from the normal flora. Both steps are done to maximize the
probability of isolating mycobacteria in culture. No single decontamination method is applicable to
all circumstances, laboratories and clinical specimens; therefore, a laboratory should use the best
suited method that keeps the contamination rate between 3 % and 5 %. A contamination rate lower than
3 % may indicate that the procedure used is too harsh and may be killing the mycobacteria (Della
Latta 2004).
The decontamination methods most commonly used are (Table 12-2):
· Sodium hydroxide. This method uses sodium hydroxide at concentrations ranging between 2 % and 4 %
to digest and, at the same time, decontaminate the specimen. Each laboratory should determine the
lowest concentration for optimal digestion and decontamination (Della Latta 2004).
· N-acetylcysteine-sodium hydroxide, sodium chloride and sodium hydroxide. This method, one of the
most used worldwide, uses N-acetylcysteine for mucus digestion and sodium hydroxide as the
decontaminant (Della Latta 2004).
· Oxalic acid. This method is recommended for decontamination of clinical specimens that may have
Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a contaminant, usually urine specimens and pulmonary specimens from cystic
fibrosis patients (Della Latta 2004, Cooper 1930).
· Ogawa-Kudoh. This is a very simple and practical decontamination method that obviates the use of
specimen centrifugation prior to culturing. The procedure was described by Kudoh using sodium
hydroxide as the digestant-decontaminant and inoculation in a modified Ogawa media (Kudoh 1974). It
does not require laboratory facilities and can be performed in the field, as described below:
- With the aid of a sterile cotton swab, obtain a significant portion of the specimen
- Submerge the applicator in a tube containing 3 mL of 4 % sodium hydroxide solution
- Incubate at room temperature for two minutes
- Remove the applicator from the sodium hydroxide solution
- Inoculate a tube containing modified Ogawa culture medium
- With the same applicator, make a smear for AFB microscopic examination
Table 12-2: Decontamination methods
Method Use Advantage Disadvantage
Sodium
hydroxide Laboratories using concentration by centrifugation - Digestion / decontamination at the
same time when used at a final concentration of 2 %
- Low cost - Precise timing needed to avoid killing mycobacteria - may kill some mycobacteria even
at 2 % concentration
N-acetyl-cysteine - sodium chloride - sodium hydroxide - Most used in developed countries
- Used in combination with centrifugation - Good mucolytic action
- Use of NaCl as mucolytic reduces NaOH concentration and its potential deleterious action on
mycobacteria - Short shelf-life of prepared reagents (24 h)
- Higher cost
Oxalic acid - Recommended to eliminate P. aeruginosa contamination (e.g. in urine, specimens
from cystic fibrosis patients) - Effective in inhibiting overgrowth by Pseudomonas - Use
restricted to inhibit Pseudomonas
Ogawa-Kudoh - Ideal method for low-resource settings - Centrifugation or concentration is not
necessary
- Low cost
- Can be used in the field - May have higher contamination rates
Cetyl pyridinium - sodium chloride - For preservation and digestion / decontamination while in
transport to the laboratory - Avoids overgrowth of contaminants for up to eight days - Egg-based
media required since compound remains active in agar and may be deleterious to mycobacteria
· Cethyl pyridinium and sodium chloride. This method is useful to preserve specimens from
contaminant flora overgrowth while in transit to the laboratory and also fulfills the
decontamination step required prior to culture. It has demonstrated viability of mycobacteria
exposed for eight days to CPC (Smithwick 1975).
12.5.3. Concentration of mycobacteria
With the exception of the Ogawa-Kudoh method, specimens are inoculated after a concentration step,
which is done by spontaneous sedimentation or, more frequently, by centrifugation. Many laboratories
report centrifugation speeds in revolutions per minute (rpm). However, this speed measure is related
to each particular centrifuge. The measure of sedimentation efficiency is the relative centrifugal
force (RCF), which considers the radius from the centre of the rotating head to the bottom of the
centrifuge tube (R max) and the centrifuge speed (rpm). The RCF may be calculated from the formula:
RCF = 1.12 x R max (in mm) x (rpm/1,000) x 2
The optimum RCF and centrifugation time combination have been determined to be 4,000 x g for 15 min.
(Perera 1999) but an RCF of 3,000 x g applied for 15 min, or an RCF of about 2,000 to 2,500 x g
applied for 20 min, is still considered adequate to concentrate mycobacteria in clinical specimens.
Lower RCF and/or centrifugation times may lead to a considerable loss of mycobacteria. The sediment
of the concentration step will be inoculated directly onto the culture medium, or after
decontamination in the case of non-sterile specimens that did not undergo decontamination before the
concentration step.
12.5.4. Culture media
Different culture media are in use for the isolation of mycobacteria. The most common are based on
egg and also contain high concentrations of malachite green to overcome contamination with other
bacteria. Detailed guidelines for the preparation of the most widely used egg-based media,
Löwenstein-Jensen and Ogawa, are freely accessible on the internet (Laboratory Services in
Tuberculosis Control Part III: Culture: http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/dls/ila/documents/lstc3.pdf). In
general, after the centrifugation step, sediments are inoculated onto two Löwenstein-Jensen slants.
In areas with a high incidence of bovine TB, a tube with Stonebrink medium should be added. M. bovis
and other species of the M. tuberculosis complex (M. microti and M. africanum) are unable to use
glycerol as a carbon source due to the lack of a functioning pyruvate kinase. Thus, these organisms
will often fail to grow on Löwenstein-Jensen medium, which contains glycerol as the only available
carbon source (Keating 2005, see Chapter 3). Stonebrink medium has the same composition as
Löwenstein-Jensen, with the exception that glycerol is replaced by 0.5 % sodium pyruvate. Many
diagnostic laboratories that employ egg-based medium for the isolation of mycobacteria, omit the use
of Stonebrink medium. This probably leads to an underestimation of the actual weight of M. bovis as
a human TB agent, especially in developing countries (see Chapter 8).
The Ogawa medium is another egg-based medium, which is comparable in its composition with
Löwenstein-Jensen. It is more economic because it replaces asparagine by sodium glutamate, an amino
acid more readily available and much cheaper. Modified Ogawa medium (pH 6.4) is the same egg-based
Ogawa medium that has been acidified in such a way as to allow the direct inoculation of specimens
decontaminated by the Kudoh method. This combination is very suitable for culturing sputum specimens
in rural settings.
Middlebrook 7H10 and 7H11 are agar-based media. Their basic ingredients are commercially available:
powder base, agar and Middlebrook OADC enrichment. Middlebrook 7H9 is a liquid medium and may be
prepared from commercially available powder base supplemented with Middlebrook ADC enrichment after
sterilization. Incubation in a 5 % to 10 % CO2 atmosphere is recommended. Middlebrook media have
been shown to achieve slightly higher isolation yields than egg-based media, but are considerably
more expensive.
Details for the preparation of the above mentioned media can be found in the annual on Laboratory
Services in Tuberculosis Control Part III: Culture, which is freely available on the internet at
http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/dls/ila/documents/lstc3.pdf.
The BACTEC TB-460 system was the first semi-automated system to appear on the market for
mycobacteria culturing, and still serves as the benchmark for quality, reliability and performance.
In the last decade, several new commercial culture media have been introduced, such as the
Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT), Bract/Alert, ESP Mice, MB Redox and KRD "Niche B",
biphasic Septic-Check AFB and Mice-Acid, and BACTEC MGIT960 systems. Like BACTEC TB-460, these newer
systems are based on liquid media. Liquid culture media has been proven to be significantly more
sensitive than egg-based solid media for the isolation of mycobacteria from clinical specimens
(Hines 2006). However, one disadvantage is the much higher price, which is often too high for
cost-effective TB diagnosis in resource-limited countries. These methods are described in detail in
Chapter 14.
Blood agar is an alternative culture medium for isolation of mycobacteria. Historically,
microbiologists and medical students have been taught for decades that isolation of mycobacteria
requires a defined, egg-based medium such as Löwenstein-Jensen. In fact, the tubercle bacillus does
not have special growth requirements (see Chapter 3), and blood agar is at least as efficient as the
widely recommended egg-based media. M. tuberculosis grows within one to two weeks on blood agar
plates, and it has been reported that the average number of colonies isolated from clinical
specimens on blood agar is significantly higher than the number of colonies on the egg-based medium
(Dracut 2003). Preliminary studies suggested that blood agar can also be used as an alternative
medium for susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis against isoniazid, rifampicin, streptomycin and
ethambutol. Reportedly, results are obtained much earlier with blood agar (2 weeks) than with 7H10
agar (3 weeks) (Coban 2005, Coban 2006). Desiccation is prevented by sealing the plates with tape or
by using tubes instead of plates. Blood agar plates are readily available in most laboratories
dedicated to general bacteriology, and thus, in the absence of more specific media, they could be
used for the culture of mycobacteria, especially in resource-limited countries.
12.5.5. Reading of results
Conventional culture media such as those based on egg and agar should be examined for growth twice a
week for the first four weeks starting on day 3 to 5 post-inoculation, and thereafter, once a week
until the eighth week. All specimens showing growth in culture should be confirmed as AFB by smear
microscopy of the colonies and reported immediately as "culture positive for mycobacteria pending
identification". All cultures reported positive for mycobacteria should be identified to the level
of species using either biochemical or molecular methods.
M. tuberculosis bacilli are slow-growing mycobacteria. This means that, in primary isolation, they
hardly show any visible growth during the first week of culture. On egg-based media they produce
characteristic non-pigmented colonies, with a general rough and dry appearance simulating
breadcrumbs (Figure 12-2). On agar-based media, the colonies appear flat, dry and rough with
irregular edges.
Figure 12-2: Colonies of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Löwenstein Jensen medium (Courtesy of A.
Martin).
Cross-contamination can produce false positive results. The causes of false-positive cultures
include contamination of clinical devices (i.e. bronchoscopes), clerical errors, and laboratory
cross-contamination. In a recent review, false-positive cultures were identified in 13 of the 14
studies that evaluated 100 or more patients; the median false-positive rate was 3.1 % (interquartile
range, 2.2 % - 10.5 %). Patients having only one positive culture when two tubes were inoculated and
patients with only a few colonies in the culture should be further evaluated for the possibility of
a false-positive result (Burman 2000).
12.6. Identification
12.6.1. Biochemical procedures
The final species identification of M. tuberculosis is based on characteristics such as slow growth,
colony morphology, and biochemical tests. From a practical point of view, most isolates from human
disease belong to the species M. tuberculosis. However, depending on geographical and
epidemiological circumstances, it may be necessary to differentiate species within the M.
tuberculosis complex (see Chapter 8).
An initial identification as M. tuberculosis is defined on AFB bacilli from slow-growing,
non-pigmented colonies that are niacin positive, are inhibited by p-nitrobenzoic acid and display
nitratase activity. Additional tests that confirm an isolate as M. tuberculosis are susceptibility
to pyrazinamide, growth on thiophene carboxylic acid hydrazide, absence of catalase production at
68°C and absence of iron uptake. Table 12-3 summarizes the differential characteristics of species
in the M. tuberculosis complex.
Table 12-3: Colony morphological and biochemical characteristics of species in the M. tuberculosis
complex
Test M.. tuberculosis M. bovis M. bovis BCG M. africanum M. microti
"M. canettii"
Morphology rough rough rough rough rough smooth
Pyruvate rather than glycerol as carbon source - + + - - -
Pyrazimidase + - - + + +
Niacin + - - +/- + -
Nitratase + - - +/- - +
Urease +/- - + +/- +/- +
Susceptibility to TCH R S S S S R
O2 requirement aerobic Micro-aerophilic aerobic Micro-aerophilic Micro-aerophilic Unknown
R= resistant, S= susceptible, TCH= Thiophene-2-carboxylic acid hydrazide
12.6.2. Main biochemical tests to identify M. tuberculosis
· Niacin accumulation test. Nicotinic acid or niacin is produced by all mycobacteria, but some
species, such as M. tuberculosis, Mycobacterium simiae and M. bovis BCG, excrete it due to a
blockade in their scavenging pathway. The excreted niacin accumulates in the culture medium and is
evidenced in the presence of cyanogen halide with a primary amine (Figure 12-3). Niacin-negative M.
tuberculosis strains are extremely rare.
· Growth in the presence of p-nitrobenzoic acid. This compound inhibits the growth of several
species in the M. tuberculosis complex: M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. africanum and M. microti
(Tsukamura 1984, Lećo 2004).
· Nitrate reduction test. This test is particularly useful for differentiating M. tuberculosis,
which gives a positive reaction, from M. bovis, which is negative (Tsukamura 1984, Vincent 2003).
· Catalase test. Catalase is an intracellular enzyme that transforms hydrogen peroxide to oxygen and
water. The 68°C catalase is a heat-tolerance test measuring the catalase activity at high
temperature. Characteristically, M. tuberculosis gives negative results, as do other species in the
M. tuberculosis complex. (Vincent 2003).
· Pyrazinamidase test. Pyrazinamidase is an enzyme that hydrolyzes pyrazinamide to ammonia and
pyrazinoic acid. The test is useful to differentiate M. tuberculosis (positive) from the other
species of the M. tuberculosis complex (negative), with the exception of "M. canettii", which is
also positive. Some strains of M. tuberculosis may acquire resistance to pyrazinamide due to
selective pressure induced by treatment with this drug. These strains give a negative pyrazimidase
test (unable to transform pyrazinamide to pyrazinoic acid, the active form of the drug) (Vincent
2003).
· Growth in the presence of thiophen-2-carboxylic acid hydrazide. This test is useful to distinguish
M. tuberculosis, which grows in the presence of this compound, from other members of the M.
tuberculosis complex. "M. canettii" and most non-tuberculous mycobacterial species are also positive
to this test (Vincent 2003, Lećo 2004).
Figure 12-3: Niacin test (Courtesy of A. Martin).
12.6.3. Isolation of non-tuberculous mycobacteria
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous organisms that are frequently isolated from
environmental sources, including surface water, tap water, and soil. Specimens from the respiratory
tract often grow NTM. The isolation of NTM species from a respiratory specimen is not enough
evidence for the presence of NTM lung disease, the diagnosis of which must rely on clinical,
radiographic, and bacteriologic criteria. Both the American Thoracic Society
(http://www.thoracic.org/sections/publications/statements/pages/mtpi/nontuberc1-27.html) and the
British Thoracic Society (http://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/c2/uploads/OppMyco.pdf) have issued
guidelines regarding the diagnosis of lung disease due to NTM. Both guidelines highlight the
difficulty inherent in differentiating patients with clinical lung disease caused by NTM from those
in whom the isolation of clinical specimens raises a suspicion of disease. At least three
respiratory specimens should be evaluated from each patient to establish the clinical significance
of the infection. The NTM species most frequently associated with pulmonary disease are M. avium,
Mycobacterium kansasii and Mycobacterium abscessus.
Wound infections, prosthetic valve endocarditis, infections complicating mammary augmentation
surgery, and other cutaneous/subcutaneous infections have been attributed to rapidly growing
mycobacteria. Mycobacterium fortuitum, M. abscessus, and Mycobacterium chelonae are the most common
mycobacteria implicated in these infections, which are thought to be caused by local environmental
strains or contaminated commercial surgical materials, devices or solutions for injection. Rapidly
growing mycobacteria often grow on classical bacterial culture media, especially on blood agar
plates. However, due to their delay in forming visible colonies (up to 10 days), they are usually
not detected in the routine bacteriology laboratory. They can also be isolated on most media
available for the isolation of mycobacteria. Although the optimum temperature for most species is
30-32°C, they also grow at 36°C to 37°C, the standard temperature for isolation of the tubercle
bacillus. Mycobacteria should be identified at the species level before starting treatment, because
different species display different antibiotic resistance patterns. An extensive review on
rapidly-growing NTM has been recently published (Brown-Elliott 2002).
Certain NTM are fastidious and special culture conditions or growth requirements should be observed
for their isolation. Because of this, the organisms are not be isolated using routine mycobacterial
culture techniques. If disease by one of these mycobacteria is suspected, the bacteriologist must be
notified so that appropriate cultivation conditions can be implemented. Mycobacterium marinum causes
localized cutaneous lesions in patients with a history of a penetrating cutaneous injury and
prolonged or repeated aquatic exposure. This microorganism grows at 30°C and its growth is inhibited
at 37°C. Two other mycobacterial pathogens require special conditions for laboratory culture:
Mycobacterium haemophilum, which causes cutaneous, joint, or pulmonary infection in
immunocompromised patients and lymphadenitis in children, grows preferentially at 30°C to 32°C, and
requires iron-supplemented media i.e. egg-based medium supplemented with iron complexes or blood
agar medium; and Mycobacterium genavense, which produces disseminated infections in HIV/AIDS
patients, grows in Middlebrook 7H11 agar supplemented with mycobactin J, and requires prolonged
incubation periods (Coley 1992).
References
1. Alisjahbana B, van Crevel R, Danusantoso H, et al. Better patient instruction for sputum sampling
can improve microscopic tuberculosis diagnosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005; 9: 814-7.
2. Anderson C, Inhaber N, Menzies D. Comparison of sputum induction with fiber-optic bronchoscopy in
the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152: 1570-4.
3. Angeby KA, Hoffner SE, Diwan VK. Should the “bleach microscopy method“ be recommended for
improved case detection of tuberculosis? Literature review and key person analysis. Int J Tuberc
Lung Dis 2004; 8: 806-15.
4. Aston NO. Abdominal tuberculosis. World J Surg 1997; 21: 492-9.
5. Banales JL, Pineda PR, Fitzgerald JM, Rubio H, Selman M, Salazar-Lezama M. Adenosine deaminase in
the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusions. A report of 218 patients and review of the
literature. Chest 1991; 99: 355-7.
6. Bobadilla-del-Valle M, Ponce-de-Leon A, Kato-Maeda M, et al. Comparison of sodium carbonate,
cetyl-pyridinium chloride, and sodium borate for preservation of sputa for culture of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 4487-8.
7. Brown-Elliott BA, Wallace RJ Jr. Clinical and taxonomic status of pathogenic nonpigmented or
late-pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002; 15: 716-46.
8. Burgess LJ, Maritz FJ, Le Roux I, Taljaard JJ. Combined use of pleural adenosine deaminase with
lymphocyte/neutrophil ratio. Increased specificity for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis. Chest
1996; 109: 414-9.
9. Burman WJ, Reves RR. Review of false-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and
recommendations for avoiding unnecessary treatment. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31: 1390-5.
10. Chan CH, Chan RC, Arnold M, Cheung H, Cheung SW, Cheng AF. Bronchoscopy and tuberculostearic
acid assay in the diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: a prospective study
with the addition of transbronchial biopsy. Q J Med 1992; 82: 15-23.
11. Coban AY, Bilgin K, Uzun M, et al. Susceptibilities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to isoniazid
and rifampin on blood agar. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43: 1930-1.
12. Coban AY, Cihan CC, Bilgin K, et al. Blood agar for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis against first-line drugs. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2006; 10: 450-3.
13. Conde MB, Soares SL, Mello FC, et al. Comparison of sputum induction with fiberoptic
bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: experience at an acquired immune deficiency syndrome
reference center in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 2238-40.
14. Cooper HJ, Uyei N. Oxalic acid as a reagent for isolation of tubercle bacilli and a study of the
growth of acid fast nonpathogens in different media with the reaction to chemical reagents. J Lab
Clin Med 1930; 15: 348-69.
15. Coyle MB, Carlson LC, Wallis CK, et al. Laboratory aspects of "Mycobacterium genavense" a
proposed species isolated from AIDS patients. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30: 3206-12.
16. David HL. Response of mycobacteria to ultraviolet light radiation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1973; 108:
1175-85.
17. de Gracia J, Curull V, Vidal R, et al. Diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage in suspected
pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest 1988; 93: 329-32.
18. Della Latta P. Mycobacteriology and mycobacterial susceptibility tests. In: Clinical
Microbiology Procedures Handbook. Second edition. Henry D. Isenberg Editor in Chief, ASM Press,
2004.
19. Diacon AH, Van de Wal BW, Wyser C, et al. Diagnostic tools in tuberculous pleurisy: a direct
comparative study. Eur Respir J 2003; 22: 589-91.
20. Dorronsoro I, Martin C, Cabodevilla B, Ojer M, Ruz A. [Effect of the number of samples studied
on the diagnosis of tuberculosis] Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2000; 18: 215-8.
21. Drancourt M, Carrieri P, Gevaudan MJ, Raoult D. Blood agar and Mycobacterium tuberculosis: the
end of a dogma. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 1710-1.
22. Dye C, Watt CJ, Bleed DM, Williams BG. What is the limit to case detection under the DOTS
strategy for tuberculosis control? Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2003; 83: 35-43.
23. Escudero-Bueno C, Garcia-Clemente M, Cuesta-Castro B, et al. Cytologic and bacteriologic
analysis of fluid and pleural biopsy specimens with Cope“s needle. Study of 414 patients. Arch
Intern Med 1990; 150: 1190-4.
24. Farnia P, Mohammadi F, Zarifi Z, et al. Improving sensitivity of direct microscopy for detection
of acid-fast bacilli in sputum: use of chitin in mucus digestion. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 508-11.
25. Finch D, Beaty CD. The utility of a single sputum specimen in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.
Comparison between HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected patients. Chest 1997; 111: 1174-9.
26. Gilroy D, Sherigar J. Concurrent small bowel lymphoma and mycobacterial infection: use of
adenosine deaminase activity and polymerase chain reaction to facilitate rapid diagnosis and
treatment. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18: 305-7.
27. Giusti, G Adenosine deaminase. Bergmeryer, HU eds. Methods of enzymatic analysis 1974, 1092-1099
Academic Press. New York, NY.
28. Goto M, Noguchi Y, Koyama H, Hira K, Shimbo T, Fukui T. Diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase
in tuberculous pleural effusion: a meta-analysis. Ann Clin Biochem 2003; 40: 374-81.
29. Gupta R, Espinal MA, Raviglione MC. Tuberculosis as a major global health problem in the 21st
century: a WHO perspective. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 25: 245-53.
30. Hines N, Payeur JB, Hoffman LJ. Comparison of the recovery of Mycobacterium bovis isolates using
the BACTEC MGIT 960 system, BACTEC 460 system, and Middlebrook 7H10 and 7H11 solid media. J Vet
Diagn Invest 2006; 18: 243-50.
31. Hirooka T, Higuchi T, Tanaka N, Ogura T. [The value of proper sputum collection instruction in
detection of acid-fast bacillus] Kekkaku 2004; 79: 33-7.
32. Joshi R, Reingold AL, Menzies D, Pai M. tuberculosis among health-care workers in low- and
middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2006; 3: e494.
33. Kashyap RS, Kainthla RP, Mudaliar AV, Purohit HJ, Taori GM, Daginawala HF. Cerebrospinal fluid
adenosine deaminase activity: a complimentary tool in the early diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis.
Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2006; 3: 5.
34. Keating LA, Wheeler PR, Mansoor H, et al. The pyruvate requirement of some members of the
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex is due to an inactive pyruvate kinase: implications for in vivo
growth. Mol Microbiol 2005; 56: 163-74.
35. Kent PT, Kubica GP. Public Health Mycobacteriology: A Guide for the Level III Laboratory. US
Department of Health and Human Services, 1985. CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
36. Kilinc O, Ucan ES, Cakan MD, et al. Risk of tuberculosis among healthcare workers: can
tuberculosis be considered as an occupational disease? Respir Med 2002; 96: 506-10.
37. Kim SJ, Lee SH, Kim IS, Kim HJ, Kim SK, Rieder HL. Risk of occupational tuberculosis in National
Tuberculosis Programme laboratories in Korea. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2007; 11: 138-42.
38. Kudoh S, Kudoh T. A simple technique for culturing tubercle bacilli. Bull World Health Organ
1974; 51: 71-82.
39. Lećo SC, Martin A, Mejia GI, Palomino JC, Robledo J, Telles MAS, Portaels F. Practical handbook
for the phenotypic and genotypic identification of mycobacteria. Brugges, Vanden BROELLE, 2004, 164
p. Available at: http://www.ESMycobacteriology.eu.
40. Lopez-Cortes LF, Cruz-Ruiz M, Gomez-Mateos J, et al. Adenosine deaminase activity in the CSF of
patients with aseptic meningitis: utility in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis or
neurobrucellosis. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 20: 525-30.
41. Master, R.N. Section Editor. "Mycobacteriology". Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Vol.
1, ASM, 1992, Washington, D.C.
42. McWilliams T, Wells AU, Harrison AC, Lindstrom S, Cameron RJ, Foskin E. Induced sputum and
bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Thorax 2002; 57: 1010-4.
43. Murray SJ, Barrett A, Magee JG, Freeman R. Optimisation of acid fast smears for the direct
detection of mycobacteria in clinical samples. J Clin Pathol 2003; 56: 613-5.
44. Nelson SM, Deike MA, Cartwright CP. Value of examining multiple sputum specimens in the
diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36: 467-9.
45. No authors. Management of opportunist mycobacterial infections: Joint Tuberculosis Committee
Guidelines 1999. Subcommittee of the Joint Tuberculosis Committee of the British Thoracic Society.
Thorax 2000; 55: 210-8.
46. No authors. Diagnosis and treatment of disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria. This
official statement of the American Thoracic Society was approved by the Board of Directors, March
1997. Medical Section of the American Lung Association. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: S1-S25.
47. Perera J, Arachchi DM. The optimum relative centrifugal force and centrifugation time for
improved sensitivity of smear and culture for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1999; 93: 405-9.
48. Perez-Rodriguez E, Jimenez Castro D. The use of adenosine deaminase and adenosine deaminase
isoenzymes in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2000; 6: 259-66.
49. Perkins MD, Kritski AL. Diagnostic testing in the control of tuberculosis. Bull World Health
Organ 2002; 80: 512-3.
50. Reid DD. Incidence of tuberculosis among workers in medical laboratories. Br Med J 1957; 2:
10-4.
51. Reuter H, Burgess L, van Vuuren W, Doubell A. Diagnosing tuberculous pericarditis. QJM 2006; 99:
827-39.
52. Riley RL, Nardell EA. Clearing the air. The theory and application of ultraviolet air
disinfection. Is Rev Respir Dis 1989; 139: 1286-94.
53. Sarkar SK, Sharma GS, Gupta PR, Sharma RK. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary
tuberculosis. Tubercle 1980; 61: 97-9.
54. Scott CP, Dos Anjos Filho L, De Queiroz Mello FC, et al. Comparison of
C(18)-carboxypropylbetaine and standard N-acetyl-L-cysteine-NaOH processing of respiratory specimens
for increasing tuberculosis smear sensitivity in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 3219-22.
55. Seidler A, Nienhaus A, Diel R. Review of epidemiological studies on the occupational risk of
tuberculosis in low-incidence areas. Respiration 2005; 72: 431-46.
56. Selvakumar N, Gomathi Sekar M, Kumar V, Bhaskar Rao DV, Rahman F, Narayanan PR. Sensitivity of
Ziehl-Neelsen method for centrifuged deposit smears of sputum samples transported in
cetyl-pyridinium chloride. Indian J Med Res 2006; 124: 439-42.
57. Selvakumar N, Sekar MG, Ilampuranan KJ, Ponnuraja C, Narayanan PR. Increased detection by
restaining of acid-fast bacilli in sputum samples transported in cetylpyridinium chloride solution.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005; 9: 195-9.
58. Selvakumar N, Sudhamathi S, Duraipandian M, Frieden TR, Narayanan PR. Reduced detection by
Ziehl-Neelsen method of acid-fast bacilli in sputum samples preserved in cetylpyridinium chloride
solution. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004; 8: 248-52.
59. Smithwick RW, Stratigos CB, David HL. Use of cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium chloride for
the decontamination of sputum specimens that are transported to the laboratory for the isolation of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1975; 1: 411-3.
60. Somoskovi A, Hotaling JE, Fitzgerald M, O“Donnell D, Parsons LM, Salfinger M. Lessons from a
proficiency testing event for acid-fast microscopy. Chest 2001; 120: 250-7.
61. Steingart KR, Henry M, Ng V, et al. Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for
tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2006; 6: 570-81.
62. Steingart KR, Ng V, Henry M, et al. Sputum processing methods to improve the sensitivity of
smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2006; 6: 664-74.
63. Steingart KR, Vivienne Ng V, Henry M. et al. Sputum processing methods to improve the
sensitivity of smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review Lancet Infect Dis. 2006; 6:
664-74.
64. Stenson W, Aranda C, Bevelaqua FA. Transbronchial biopsy culture in pulmonary tuberculosis.
Chest 1983; 83: 883-4.
65. Tsukamura M. Identification of Mycobacteria. The Mycobacteriosis Research Laboratory of the
National Chubu Hospital, Obu, Aichi 474, Japan, 1984.
66. Tuon FF, Litvoc MN, Lopes MI. Adenosine deaminase and tuberculous pericarditis--a systematic
review with meta-analysis. Acta Trop 2006; 99: 67-74.
67. Valdes L, Alvarez D, San Jose E, et al. Tuberculous pleurisy: a study of 254 patients. Arch
Intern Med 1998; 158: 2017-21.
68. Van Deun A, Hamid Salim A, Aung KJ, et al. Performance of variations of carbolfuchsin staining
of sputum smears for AFB under field conditions. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005; 9: 1127-33.
69. Vestal AL. Procedures for the isolation and identification of myocbacteria. US Department of
Health, Education and Welfare. Center for Disease Control. Atlanta. 1978.
70. Vincent V, Brown-Elliot B, Jost KC, Wallace RJ. Mycobacterium: Phenotypic and genotypic
identification. pp: 560-84. In: Manual of Clinical Microbiology 8th edition. Murray PR, JoBaron E,
Jorgensen JH, Pfaller MA, Yolken RH, editors. ASM Press, Washington, DC. 2003.
71. Yassin MA, Cuevas LE. How many sputum smears are necessary for case finding in pulmonary
tuberculosis? Trop Med Int Health 2003; 8: 927-32.
|
|
|
|
|||